US Senate votes against Bernie Sanders bid to mandate human rights report on Israel aid

Dozens of organisations, including Jewish and Palestinian American groups, endorsed the resolution

Senator Bernie Sanders attempted to require President Joe Biden’s administration to conduct a report on purported Israeli human rights abuses in Gaza. Bloomberg

The US Senate on Tuesday rejected a resolution led by progressive independent Bernie Sanders that would have required President Joe Biden’s administration to conduct a report on the possibility of Israeli human rights abuses during its war in Gaza.

If passed, it would not have limited or created conditions on Washington’s support to Israel, but would have required a State Department report on how the aid is being used.

Mr Sanders defended the failed resolution on the Senate floor on Tuesday night. It was rejected by 72 votes to 11.

He spoke in front of enlarged photos showing Palestinian refugee children, and said that Washington “cannot look away” from the scale of destruction in Gaza.

“This is a very modest, commonsense proposal, and [it’s] frankly very hard for me to understand who would oppose it,” he said before the vote.

“We will be voting on a very simple question: Do we support asking the State Department whether human rights violations may have occurred using US equipment or assistance in this war?”

The Senate’s answer to that question: No.

No reason to change requirements on US military aid to Israel, says top senator

The vote came after the Israeli military at the weekend said they were moving into “lower intensity” operations in Gaza. Health authorities there said almost 25,000 people have been killed by Israeli attacks, and two million people have been displaced in the enclave.

Last week, the International Court of Justice in The Hague heard South Africa’s case accusing Israel of a genocidal campaign against Palestinians.

Mr Sanders’ resolution would not have created a law, but invoked a long-standing one.

US law technically prohibits security assistance, including arms sales, to any government that engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights.

But the provision in question – Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act – “has rarely been invoked in recent decades despite continued assistance to governments implicated in human rights abuses and likely violations of international humanitarian law,” according to the Washington based non-profit Centre for Civilians in Conflict, which endorsed Mr Sanders’ resolution.

Read more of this report

Visited 93 times, 1 visit(s) today

Comments are closed.