Trump’s fraud-trial judge declines his ‘nonsensical’ mistrial bid
The judge in former President Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial in New York on Friday denied defense lawyers’ bid for a mistrial, saying it was based on “irrelevant” and “nonsensical” arguments and evidence.
The judge in Trump’s civil fraud trial did not mince words in rejecting a defense mistrial bid.
His decision criticizes Trump’s ‘irrelevant’ and ‘nonsensical’ evidence and arguments.
The judge throws his full support behind Trump’s favorite target in the case: the law clerk.
Donald Trump giving a monologue to journalists in the hallway outside the courtroom of his fraud trial.David Dee Delgado/Getty Images
Politics Donald Trump, ungagged, is right back to attacking his fraud trial’s law clerk
Rep. Kevin McCarthy, right, and Sen. Markwayne Mullin, are seen on the House floor of the Capitol during a second ballot in which Rep. Jim Jordan, Republican nominee for speaker, failed to receive enough votes to win the position on Wednesday, October 18, 2023.Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
Politics Former GOP House member’s wife said Sen. Markwayne Mullin put his finger in the noses of sleeping members of Congress and their spouses on a trip to Israel
Politics China is helping the US deal with its massive fentanyl problem — sort of
The six-page decision came two days after the defense asked that the trial be scuttled on claims that the judge and his principal law clerk were biased against them and that the law clerk was somehow running the trial.
“As I have made clear over the course of this trial, my rulings are mine, and mine alone,” the judge, New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron wrote in the decision.
The decision fact-checked claims that the defense had made against the principal law clerk, Allison Greenfield, an attorney who is running for a judgeship herself and who has taken a vocal role in assisting Engoron from her seat just three feet to the judge’s right.