Rule of Law Caucus Refutes False Negotiation Claims, Affirms Commitment to Supreme Court Ruling
Monrovia, Liberia – April 15, 2025 – The Rule of Law Caucus within the House of Representatives has issued a strong denial of widespread rumors suggesting ongoing negotiations between the Caucus and the Majority Bloc.
The Caucus specifically addressed reports implicating the Council of Chiefs and Elders (EDOs), allegedly under the facilitation of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, as intermediaries in these purported discussions involving the Speaker of the House and members of the Majority Bloc.
In a decisive statement released today, the Rule of Law Caucus unequivocally declared such claims to be “entirely false and misleading.
” The Caucus emphasized that neither the Speaker, Honorable J. Fonati Koffa, nor any member of the Rule of Law Caucus has participated in any discussions or negotiations with any group or political faction concerning the matter currently before the Supreme Court of Liberia.
The Caucus reiterated its unwavering stance, stating that it is “awaiting the ruling of the Supreme Court, which is the final arbiter in this matter.
” Stressing the fundamental principles at stake, the statement underscored that “This case is not about individuals — it is about the sanctity of our laws, the authority of our institutions, and the future of our democracy.”
Furthermore, the Rule of Law Caucus called upon the Liberian public and all relevant stakeholders to maintain composure and to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.
The Caucus urged citizens to “reject any narrative that seeks to undermine the rule of law,” emphasizing the importance of respecting the Supreme Court’s role as the ultimate legal authority in the nation.
This firm statement from the Rule of Law Caucus seeks to dispel any confusion and reaffirm its commitment to the legal process, particularly concerning the matter currently under the Supreme Court’s consideration.
The Caucus’s direct address of the circulating rumors underscores its dedication to transparency and its resolve to allow the judicial system to operate without external influence or speculation.
Comments are closed.