President Boakai’s Anti-Corruption Credibility Under Scrutiny: Selective Accountability Fuels Public Distrust

President Joseph Boakai’s administration is facing mounting criticism over its perceived inconsistent approach to combating corruption. Allegations of selective accountability are eroding public trust and undermining promised reforms. A recent statement by Anderson Miamen, head of the Center for Transparency and Accountability in Liberia (CENTAL), highlights these concerns, focusing particularly on the case of Dorr Cooper and the broader pattern of seemingly preferential treatment for certain officials.  

Miamen’s statement directly challenges President Boakai to dismiss Dorr Cooper, citing his “fraudulent academic activities at the University of Liberia.” This demand is framed within a wider context of perceived inconsistencies, drawing parallels to the handling of other officials like Abullai Kamara of the Liberia Telecommunications Authority (LTA), who, along with others, were reportedly not suspended or dismissed despite allegations.  

The criticism extends beyond Cooper’s case, pointing to the controversial handling of former Central Bank Governor Allocius Tarlue’s suspension. The initial suspension, presumably for alleged corruption, was followed by a substantial settlement payment, raising questions about the administration’s commitment to thorough investigations and prosecutions. Miamen suggests a double standard, alleging that President Boakai acts swiftly against officials perceived as aligned with the previous administration or those outside his inner circle, while shielding those considered close allies.  

The core of the issue revolves around Dorr Cooper’s alleged academic misconduct. Miamen emphasizes that the University of Liberia, under both its former and current leadership, has substantiated claims of academic fraud. The fact that individuals who facilitated Cooper’s alleged misconduct were dismissed by the university, while Cooper remains in a position of authority, is seen as a glaring contradiction.  

This perceived leniency towards Cooper is not only viewed as a lapse in accountability but also as a detrimental message to students and the public at large. Miamen argues that it sends a signal that cheating and unethical behavior are tolerated, undermining the administration’s stated commitment to integrity and transparency.

The statement concludes with a strong call for President Boakai to dismiss Dorr Cooper immediately. This action, Miamen argues, is essential to demonstrate a genuine commitment to combating corruption and to reassure both domestic and international partners of the administration’s seriousness in upholding accountability.

Expanding on the Concerns:

• Erosion of Public Trust: The perception of selective accountability breeds cynicism and distrust among citizens. It undermines the belief that the government is genuinely committed to fairness and justice, jeopardizing public support for anti-corruption initiatives.
• Impact on International Partnerships: Liberia’s international partners, who often provide crucial financial and technical assistance, are closely monitoring the government’s anti-corruption efforts. Perceived inconsistencies can damage these partnerships and hinder development efforts.
• Weakening of Institutional Integrity: The failure to hold high-ranking officials accountable weakens the integrity of public institutions and undermines the rule of law. It creates a culture of impunity, where individuals believe they can act without consequences.  
• Negative Example for Future Generations: As Miamen pointed out, the message sent to students and young people is critical. If those in positions of power are not held accountable for their actions, it normalizes unethical behavior and discourages adherence to ethical standards.
• The need for a transparent process: The public requires a transparent process when officials are accused of corruption. Any investigation should be handled with impartiality, and the findings should be made public. This will allow the people to regain their trust in the government.
• The need for consistent application of the law: The anti-corruption guidelines need to be applied consistently, regardless of who is involved. This is the only way to ensure that the process is fair and just.